SOLDIERS OF IDF VS ARAB TERRORISTS

SOLDIERS OF IDF VS ARAB TERRORISTS
Showing posts with label Time Magazine's Jerusalem Bureau Chief Karl Vick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Time Magazine's Jerusalem Bureau Chief Karl Vick. Show all posts

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Time's Karl Vick is an idiot

We have shown pretty conclusively that Time magazine's Karl Vick is an idiot when it comes to reporting about Israel. No matter how many times he is proven wrong, he keeps barreling on with his rose-colored view of Arab intransigence and his continuous blaming of everything on Israel.

Here's reason #11 Karl Vick is an idiot.

Last week he wrote:

Earlier this year, however, Meshaal endorsed the Abu Mazen approach. While reserving the right to violent resistance and not renouncing the Hamas Charter, which calls for the destruction of Israel, Meshaal said the time has come for negotiations with Israel and nonviolent protest in the spirit of the Arab Spring. "Now we have a common ground that we can work on--the popular resistance, which represents the power of the people," Meshaal said.
And here is what Meshal said just last week at the same time that Time was publishing Vick's drivel:
Reiterating his support for the Arab Spring, Mash'al said: "Hamas recognizes the value of Arab peoples, and it has no other way than to support the rights of the peoples and their aspiration for freedom and honor... Hamas has memory, values, and morality, and therefore it does not forget those who assisted it and who continue to do so. The movement will not strike a bargain over the blood of the ummah and of Arab peoples... The best defense, and the strength of [our] foreign policy, which is based on conflict (with Israel), is manifested in our support for the resistance and by granting rights to the people. Today is the day of the Arab Spring. There is no turning back. Democracy is our right, and resistance is our duty."

Mash'al went on to warn that Israel intends to create a new reality in Jerusalem, and that therefore, "following the [Arab] Spring, we [Arabs] must prepare for the project of liberating Jerusalem – and the Palestinian role [in this] is no substitute for the Arab role." He called for ending negotiations with Israel: "The time has come to overturn the negotiating table on those who wished to enslave us."

He then called on the Palestinian leadership and all its factions to begin the major step of ending division and completing the national reconciliation, adding: "Resistance, not negotiation, is the path to the restoration of rights. Nothing will restore the homeland but jihad, the rifle, and self-sacrifice.
Vick never reports on Hamas' warmongering statements, except to downplay them. And his bending over backwards to make Meshal into some kind of peacemaker at the exact same time Meshal is pushing a terror war is simply the latest example of his willful blindness - and, by extension, the willful blindness of Time magazine.

Other reasons Vick is an anti-Israel idiot who will tilt every fact towards how he wants it to be rather than what it actually is:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10

And these are just the articles I happen to have noticed in the past couple of years.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Time magazine's disgusting Itamar story: "Murder by knife"

Time magazine's Karl Vick writes an article that is supposedly about the Itamar slaughter - but is in fact about how much he hates Israel.

Here's every word Vick wrote about the massacre:

The murder by knife of three children, including an infant of 3 months, and both parents in a West Bank settlement late Friday night rocked Israel terribly.

...The slaughter did not eradicate the family. Three of the Fogel children survived — two brothers who were asleep in another bedroom, and their 12-year-old sister, who discovered the scene when she arrived home at midnight from a meeting of a youth group. The means of entry into the settlement was apparently a hole cut in the perimeter fence, undetected by civilian guards. But the identity of the attackers remains unknown.
See? It wasn't so bad - three children survived! What are those Jews getting all hot and bothered about?

Out of a 922 word story, the actual murders, dealt with only peripherally, take up a mere 97 words. All without a single detail on what actually happened outside the two words "by knife."

By contrast, saying that Israel was consumed with revenge took 87 words.

240 words were about Israel's settlements and how they are the main obstacle to peace.

77 words about the release of gruesome photos of the victims and supposedly tasteless banner ads by victim aid organizations that referred to the attacks.

97 words were written on the "cycle of violence" between Palestinian Arabs who have killed settlers and reprisal attacks by Jews.

And 94 words on the funeral.

I searched Time's site and did not find any other articles that described the murders at all, so it is not as if this story was assuming that the readers knew about the details. These are all the details that Time felt necessary to give. In other words, the settlements and Israeli politicization of the murders are the story; the murders themselves are just a minor detail.

Vick also writes about the smallish, largely ineffective unity protests in the West Bank and Gaza yesterday.

While he didn't fall for the absurd estimate from Ma'an of  between 200,000 and 300,000 protesters in Gaza, more accurately saying 10,000, he downplays the Hamas attacks on the protesters with the passive-voice trick:
Scuffles and injuries were reported.
However, check out this part:
Part of the problem Tuesday was the number of venues. Gaza had to demonstrate separately — it's separated from the West Bank by miles and Israeli barricades.
That's like saying that Canada is separated from Mexico by miles and American checkpoints.

Vick cannot even bring himself to mention that an entire country separates Gaza from the West Bank.

To him, Israel is merely an unjust obstacle stopping Palestinian Arabs from freely traveling to each other.

---

Sunday, Mar. 13, 2011

Slaughter of the Fogels: After the West Bank Killings

The murder by knife of three children, including an infant of 3 months, and both parents in a West Bank settlement late Friday night rocked Israel terribly. The news broke on Saturday morning, and the shock was somehow both muted and amplified by the enforced public silence of the Jewish Sabbath. But Shabbat ended at sundown, and freed from the strictures of enforced rest, events lurched forward with something very like vengeance.
First came the condemnations. "This is a despicable murder of an entire innocent family, parents, children and an infant, while they were sleeping in their home on the Sabbath evening," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. "We all know," Netanyahu added, "as those who want to strike at us will know, that the future of the settlements will not be decided by terror." (See the West Bank's emerging middle class.)
A few hours later, however, the Prime Minister made certain that the attack would, in fact, have a direct impact on Israel's West Bank settlements. Before Sunday dawned, his government had approved construction of 500 new homes on Palestinian territory. The homes are to be built on settlement blocs close to the 1967 border, densely packed and often suburban, rather than in the remote hilltop settlements like Itamar, where the Fogel family lived and where friction with neighboring Palestinians is far more common. But it was the first new construction Netanyahu's government has approved, and the clearest effort to transmute the deaths of the Fogels into politics. It would not be the only one.
"This is unfortunately the first time since the formation of the second Netanyahu government that new housing has been approved," said Danny Dayan, who chairs the umbrella group for settlers. "And it's a pity that parents and their children needed to be murdered for it to do so." The group called for many more houses on the West Bank, which many Jews believe is theirs by a promise from God. In Sunday's Cabinet meeting, Interior Minister Eli Yishai suggested a formula: "At least a thousand homes for each person murdered," he said. (See photos of young Palestinians.)
The more than 100 Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land are widely considered illegal under international law. Last month, a U.S. veto ended an attempt in the U.N. Security Council to condemn the policy.
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman ordered Israel's U.N. delegation to file a complaint over the Itamar attack. "Israel is expecting to hear a strong condemnation from all democratic states, which in the name of human rights hurry to denounce every movement of a trailer in Judea and Samaria," the biblical name the settlers use for the West Bank.
The government authorized the release of crime-scene photos, and reporters' inboxes filled with JPEGs of the gruesome, evenly lit interior of a house, littered with children's toys and blood. "Terror Has Struck Again" ran an advertisement flashing on the Jerusalem Post website. "While you slept on Friday night, the Fogel family was MURDERED." The ad, which featured photos of the victims stippled with cartoon bullet holes, solicited funds for a nonprofit that helps survivors of terror attacks.
The slaughter did not eradicate the family. Three of the Fogel children survived — two brothers who were asleep in another bedroom, and their 12-year-old sister, who discovered the scene when she arrived home at midnight from a meeting of a youth group. The means of entry into the settlement was apparently a hole cut in the perimeter fence, undetected by civilian guards. But the identity of the attackers remains unknown. Israeli forces have detained some 20 Palestinians from nearby villages, reportedly including relatives of two Palestinians recently killed. (Watch video of Palestinians who are taking a nonviolent approach to the conflict.)
Jewish settlers and Palestinians have clashed many times since Itamar was built in 1984, just outside of Nablus. Three times in 2002, gunmen penetrated the fence and killed settlers, twice with guns, once with a knife. Extremist settlers also attack Palestinians, sometimes in a convoluted payback when the Israeli army moves against the settlers. Five Palestinian cars were set alight on Sunday, according to press reports. "It's an ongoing scene of violence — mutual violence," says Sarit Michaeli, spokesperson for the B'Tselem human-rights organization. "Off the top of my head I can think of 10 very serious incidents."
Terror attacks, however, have become exceedingly rare on the West Bank in recent years. Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas preaches nonviolence, and PA security forces coordinate discreetly with Israeli authorities to suppress attacks, often through night raids on private homes. The policy has been effective. Officials indicated no evidence of involvement of any known militant network, such as the military wing of Hamas, in Friday's attack. (Comment on this story.)
But Netanyahu found grounds to blame the Palestinian Authority, repeatedly calling on Abbas to cease "incitement" against Israel, and criticizing his generalized condemnation — "violence will only bring more violence" — as a "stuttered reply." A more junior Palestinian official, Dmitry Dliani of the Fatah Revolutionary Council, was quoted as calling the settlements "a massacre of the entire Palestinian nation" that "destroys the remaining hopes for peace."
Amid it all, the five victims were buried in Jerusalem, as 20,000 people looked on, including a crowd of reporters. Delivering the eulogy of Udi Fogel, whose body was found beside his infant daughter, Udi's elder brother Motti Fogel said, "All of the slogans we hear are trying to efface the simple fact that you're dead, and nothing can efface that. This funeral has to be a private affair. A man dies to himself, to his children. Udi, you are not a national event. Your horrible death mustn't make your life into a pawn."

Sunday, January 16, 2011

CAMERA: Time Magazine Strikes (Israel) Again

Time Magazine and its Jerusalem Bureau Chief, Karl Vick, are making a habit of defaming Israel. The latest piece (January 11 on the Time Web site) is entitledIsrael's Rightward Lurch Scares Some Conservatives. It offers a jaundiced and factually-challenged take on recent internal Israeli issues involving citizenship questions, loyalty oaths, investigation of foreign-funded NGO's, the death of a Palestinian woman, and the demolishing of the Shepherd Hotel in Jerusalem. Vick mainly parrots far-left attacks on Israel, ignores warranted security concerns, disregards the normalcy of fractious debate in a democracy, reduces complex issues to caricature and indicts the entire public, alleging:
Self-righteous indignation is a staple position for an Israeli public whose default assumption is that Israel is always the injured party.
Vick's disparagement of the "Israeli public" is indicative of his coverage – heavy on snide editorializing, light on fact. Contrary to the reporter, of course, Israelis are sharply self-critical and often even sympathetic to their adversaries.
This is the same reporter who depicted Israelis generally as materialistic hedonists indifferent to peace in Time's notorious September 13 edition, considered anti-Semitic by many with its Star of David emblazoned with the headline: Why Israel Doesn't Care About Peace. In yet another biased piece in December, the reporter blamed Israelis for the hostility directed against them.
Vick and his editors may believe the way to salvage a declining magazine is to grab attention by maligning Israel. The publication needs to hear loud and clear the opposite will happen! The more the biased attacks on Israel, the more the magazine will lose ground – in reputation, circulation and advertising.